Light Tuna in Water Pouch vs Wild Skipjack Tuna
Bumble Bee Light Tuna in Water Pouch gives more protein per calorie than Wild Planet Wild Skipjack Tuna.
Bumble Bee Light Tuna in Water Pouch: 14 g protein, 60 calories, 0 g sugar. Wild Planet Wild Skipjack Tuna: 32 g protein, 140 calories, unknown sugar, per serving. Bumble Bee Light Tuna in Water Pouch is better on protein per 100 cal, calories, sodium; Wild Planet Wild Skipjack Tuna is better on protein.
Per serving, side by side
| Light Tuna in Water Pouch | Nutrient | Wild Skipjack Tuna |
|---|---|---|
| 23.3 g | Protein per 100 cal | 22.9 g |
| 14 g | Protein | 32 g |
| 60 | Calories | 140 |
| 0 g | Sugar | – |
| 0 g | Fiber | – |
| 194 mg | Sodium | 450 mg |
Bold marks the better value. Lower is better for calories, sugar and sodium.
Light Tuna in Water Pouch: diets
- Keto-friendly: ≤5 g net carbs
Frequently asked questions
Which has more protein, Bumble Bee Light Tuna in Water Pouch or Wild Planet Wild Skipjack Tuna?
Wild Planet Wild Skipjack Tuna has more protein per serving: 32 g versus 14 g. Per 100 calories, Bumble Bee Light Tuna in Water Pouch has 23.3 g and Wild Planet Wild Skipjack Tuna has 22.9 g.
Which has fewer calories, Bumble Bee Light Tuna in Water Pouch or Wild Planet Wild Skipjack Tuna?
Bumble Bee Light Tuna in Water Pouch has fewer calories: 60 versus 140 per serving. Serving sizes differ, so compare protein per 100 calories too.